1.Overview
The Brasília Finance Challenge (BFC) is a student investment competition open to teams from 8th grade through high school at schools anywhere in Brazil. Following the format of the leading international finance competitions, the BFC challenges participants to act as investment managers, presenting a complete portfolio strategy to a simulated institutional client.
Competition Objectives
- Promote practical financial education, preparing students to manage their own money in adult life.
- Build real skills in investment analysis and portfolio construction among students from 8th grade through high school across Brazil.
- Serve as structured preparation for teams that want to compete in international finance competitions.
- Create a network of finance-minded students across schools nationwide.
- Connect students with working finance professionals through evaluation and mentorship.
2.Eligibility
2.1 Who Can Take Part
- Any student duly enrolled from 8th grade through the 3rd year of high school at a school in any state of Brazil.
- Teams may be made up of students from a single school or from different schools, and from different grades. for example, a 9th grader from one school and a 1st-year high school student from another may form the same team.
- No prior finance knowledge or coursework is required.
2.2 Team Composition
- Minimum: 1 member per team.
- Maximum: 4 members per team.
- Each student may belong to only one registered team.
- Teams must designate a Team Leader, responsible for all official communication with the Organizing Committee.
2.3 Registration
- Registration period: July 20 to October 3, 2026.
- Registration closes: October 3, 2026.
- Registering while the competition is under way: the Trading Days began on 21 September, but registration remains open. Teams joining after the start trade for the remaining time and are assessed by the same criteria — which, as item 5 details, do not score return. Arriving later shortens your simulator time, not your chance of scoring well.
- To register, the Leader must fill out the official form with the full name, school and grade of every member.
- Registration is free.
3.Competition Format
The BFC uses the institutional client model. Participating teams take on the role of an investment manager advising an institutional client. The client profile and investment horizon will be released at the launch of the competition.
| Period | Stage | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 20 – Oct 3 | Registration | Client mandate released. Registration open to all teams. |
| Sep 21 – Oct 18 | Trading Days | Teams operate the investment simulator and build their portfolio. Part of the First Phase (Sep 21 – Oct 22). |
| Oct 22 | Results | First Phase results announced. The top 5 teams are notified. |
| Oct 22 – 30 | Preparation | Finalist teams prepare their presentations for the Grand Final. |
| Oct 30 – 31 | Grand Final | The 5 finalist teams present live to the panel of professional judges. |
4.Final Report
4.1 Objectives
- Assess the quality of the team's investment strategy, not the return the portfolio made in the simulator.
- See how the team turns a client's mandate into portfolio decisions.
- Recognise the team's own reasoning: the thesis, the choices and the conclusions.
4.2 What it must show
- That the team understood the client's goal, constraints and profile.
- That every asset in the portfolio is there for a clear reason.
- That risks were identified and have mitigation.
- That the portfolio answers the client's mandate.
4.3 The structure of the report
There are four parts, in this order: cover, portfolio allocation, strategy explanation and bibliography.
| # | Part | What goes in | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover | Team name, members, school(s) and date | One page, outside the 5 |
| 2 | Portfolio allocation | For each one: ticker or identifier, asset class and weight | Within the 5 content pages |
| 3 | Strategy explanation | Client, Thesis, Analyses and Conclusion | Within the 5 content pages |
| 4 | Bibliography | Every source cited | As many pages as needed, outside the 5 |
The strategy explanation follows a recommended order, but it is not mandatory:
| Block | What to explain |
|---|---|
| Client | The mandate's objective, constraints, risk tolerance and time horizon |
| Thesis | The central idea of the strategy and the method used to build and allocate the portfolio |
| Analyses | Macro, sector, quantitative and qualitative analyses. |
| Conclusion | Expected results and fit with the mandate |
4.4 Format
| Language | Portuguese |
| Length | A one-page cover and up to 5 content pages, plus the bibliography. The cover and the bibliography do not count toward the 5, and the bibliography can run as long as needed |
| Font | Times New Roman 11 |
| Margins | 1.5 cm on all sides |
| Line spacing | 1.5 |
| File | |
| Data sources | Public data, academic research and financial databases, cited in the bibliography |
4.5 Delivery
The team Leader sends the PDF inside the BFE site by 18 October.
4.6 AI and plagiarism
Use of AI. Tools such as ChatGPT, Claude or Larry, the BFE tutor, can help with research. The thesis, the portfolio decisions and the conclusions must reflect the team's own reasoning, and a submission that looks entirely AI-generated, with no analysis of its own, is disqualified.
Plagiarism. Copying published research, another team or a previous submission leads to immediate disqualification.
4.7 Before you submit
- A one-page cover with team, members, school(s) and date
- Portfolio allocation with 5 to 15 positions, each with an identifier, asset class and weight, and weights adding up to 100%.
- Client with the mandate's objective, constraints, risk tolerance and time horizon presented
- Central thesis stated directly.
- Risks identified and with mitigation, preferably measured.
- Conclusion linking the expected result to the mandate.
- Up to 5 content pages, Times New Roman 11, 1.5 cm margins, 1.5 line spacing, as a PDF.
- Bibliography with every source cited.
- PDF sent by the Leader inside the BFE site by 18 October.
5.Evaluation Criteria: Phase 1
Seventy percent of the grade rests on two things: how the portfolio was built and how good the thesis is. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 10, and the final grade is the panel's weighted average.
| Criterion | Weight | What the judges look at |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio Construction and Risk Management | 40% | Adequate diversification, methodology and asset allocation logic. Risk identification and credibility of the mitigations. Quantitative support is valued |
| Quality of the Investment Thesis | 30% | Clarity, originality and rigor of the central argument |
| Alignment with the Mandate | 20% | How well the strategy meets the client's objectives and constraints |
| Communication and Structure | 10% | Clarity, professionalism and compliance with the formatting rules |
The portfolio's return earns no points. A team that had a high return and nothing else loses to one that built a coherent portfolio and defended it well.
In practice: the simulator is for putting the decision into practice. What goes in the report is why each asset is there, how the risk was measured and mitigated, and how well the portfolio answers the mandate.
6.In-Person Final
6.1 Qualifying for the Final
The 5 teams with the highest weighted score in Phase 1 advance to the Grand Final. In case of a tie for 5th place, the team with the higher "Quality of the Investment Thesis" sub-score advances.
6.2 Final Format
- Each team gives a live presentation to a panel of external professional judges.
- Presentation length: 8 minutes.
- Q&A session: 4 minutes of questions from the panel immediately afterward.
- Total per team: 12 minutes.
- All team members must be present. Absent members cannot be replaced at this stage.
- Presentation media: slides in PowerPoint, Keynote or PDF projected on screen.
6.3 Final Evaluation Criteria
The Grand Final introduces an additional "Live Performance" dimension. Phase 1 scores do not carry over. The Final is scored independently.
| Criterion | Weight | What Judges Look For |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio Construction and Risk Management | 40% | Asset selection, justification of weights and methodological coherence. Depth and credibility of the risk analysis and hedging strategy. |
| Investment Thesis and Strategy | 25% | Strength and conviction of the portfolio's central thesis. |
| Alignment with the Client | 15% | How well the pitch fits the simulated client's stated needs. |
| Q&A Performance | 15% | Command of the material and ability to defend assumptions under pressure. |
| Presentation and Communication | 5% | Clarity, visual quality and professional poise. |
| TOTAL | 100% | Scores calculated as the panel average. Tie-breaking vote by the head judge. |
IMPORTANT NOTICE
As in Phase 1, portfolio return does not score. The Final's “Live Performance” assesses how the team runs the operation and defends its decisions before the panel, not how much it profited.
6.4 Venue and Logistics
- Venue: to be confirmed by the Organizing Committee.
- Finalist teams will receive confirmation and logistical details at least 10 days in advance.
- Guests and non-competing audience may attend at the discretion of the Organizing Committee.
7.Prizes
Cash prizes will be awarded to the top-placed teams in the Grand Final, deposited into a Blue3/XP account.
| Place | Prize | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Place | R$ 5,000.00 | Deposited into a Blue3/XP account. |
| 2nd Place | R$ 3,000.00 | Deposited into a Blue3/XP account. |
| 3rd Place | R$ 2,000.00 | Deposited into a Blue3/XP account. |
| 4th Place | Finalist Certificate | Formal recognition at the closing event. |
| 5th Place | Finalist Certificate | Formal recognition at the closing event. |
8.Conduct and Academic Integrity
8.1 Original Work
All written reports and presentations must represent the original work of the registered team members. Teams may use public data, academic research and financial databases as sources, provided they are properly cited in the bibliography.
8.2 Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools
Tools such as ChatGPT, Claude or Larry, the BFE tutor, can help with research. The thesis, the portfolio decisions and the conclusions must reflect the team's own reasoning, and a submission that looks entirely AI-generated, with no analysis of its own, is disqualified.
8.3 Plagiarism
Copying published research, another team or a previous submission leads to immediate disqualification.
8.4 Confidentiality of the Evaluation
The identity of the judges and the individual scores are confidential. Consolidated results will be announced officially by the Organizing Committee.
9.General Rules
- The Organizing Committee reserves the right to amend these rules. Changes will be communicated to registered teams by e-mail at least 5 days in advance.
- The Organizing Committee's decisions on all matters of the competition are final.
- Taking part implies full acceptance of these rules.
- The BFC is not responsible for transport or accommodation costs incurred by participants because of the competition.
- Photos and videos of the Final event may be published by the Organizing Committee for promotional purposes. Participants consent to this upon registering.
- These rules are valid solely for the BFC 2026.
10.Key Dates
| Period | Milestone |
|---|---|
| July 20, 2026 | Registration opens. Client mandate published. |
| October 3, 2026 | Registration closes. |
| September 21 – October 18, 2026 | Trading Days: teams operate the simulator and build their portfolios. Part of the First Phase (September 21 – October 22). |
| October 22, 2026 | First Phase results. The 5 finalist teams are notified. |
| October 22 – 30, 2026 | Finalist teams prepare for the Grand Final. |
| October 30 and 31, 2026 | In-Person Grand Final. Winners announced. Awards ceremony. |
11.Contact
For questions, registration issues or clarification on any rule, get in touch with the BFC Organizing Committee:
| clubefinancasbsb@gmail.com , Finance Club, Colégio Marista de Brasília | |
| @clubefinancasbsb | |
| Language | Support in Portuguese and English |